September 24, 2008
Never trust the media! For the umpteenth time I have rediscovered this truth. Ok, it was not the best of innings from the Rest of India batsman, but when a team scores over 220-230, it is NOT a collapse. Why was Jaffer’s innings “fine” and Dravid’s innings circumspect ? They scored 50 and 46 each in 91 and 95 balls respectively. Jaffer’s list of boundaries reads 5 while Dravid’s count is 4. So much for that.
What I gathered from the first hour and a half of the game, which I caught before heading to work, was this: it was a warm up match and this could very well have been the score that India would have got in the first Test against in Aussies had they played without a warm up, with many batsmen taking a break of over a month. The truth is Jaffer was his “domestic-player” self and looked a bit better than “finding-my-form” Dravid, in comparison. Dravid was initially very shaky, so much to have this fan very worried and sad, but he picked it up later and played some very positive shots. Yes, there are still concerns; yes, he did struggle against Ishant Sharma, as I had I predicted yesterday; yes, the back foot isn’t moving to guard the off stump – a sure sign of out-of-form-ness, but there were some cracking shots which suggest a better comeback is near. Apart from the openers Jaffer and Dravid, no one else made an impression. Laxman was elegant in pieces but threw it away too quickly. The hypes of the day – Kaif and Badri remained hypes. They did not impress with strokeplay or with thier reading of the bowling and ended up with strike rates in the 30s, lesser that both Jaffer and Dravid. Harbhajan played an impressive innings, seriously! š Ishant bowled as per hype and is at the moment worthy of all the hype. It would be interesting to see Chopra and Gambhir feast off an Ishant-less Rest of India.
As for Delhi, I thought Sehwag’s captaincy was initially defensive. I won’t comment on my gatherings from the highlights as it will tantamount to picking a team looking at scorecards alone š .Ā Delhi have a fire-power laden batting line up, but if the top 3 fail, it looks a bit brittle. The pitch might slow down after lunch tomorrow to make Day 2 the best day for batting. I’m starting to like Aakash Chopra very much and should find a place in the Indian XI, if Tendulkar doesn’t make it. Speaking of India, we still need Ganguly, the Kaif and Badri’s won’t do at the moment. After all, when you’ve got better, it would be foolish to not use it.
Tomorrow we shall find out if Harbhajan and Kumble feast off the pitch or fizzle away.
3 Comments |
Anil Kumble, Bhajji, Cricket, Dravid, Ganguly, India, India-Aus series, Indian cricket, Kumble, Laxman, Rahul Dravid, Sehwag, Sourav Ganguly, Tendulkar, The Big 3 of Indian cricket | Tagged: Aakash Chopra, Anil Kumble, Australia's tour of India 2008, Badrinath, Bhajji, Delhi, Dravid, Gambhir, Ganguly, Gautham Gambhir, Harbhajan, Harbhajan Singh, India, India-Aus series, Indian cricket, Indian Media, Irani Trohpy, Jaffer, Kaif, Kumble, Rahul Dravid, Rest of India, Sachin Tendulkar, Sehwag, Sehwag captaincy, Sourav Ganguly, Tendulkar, Test Cricket, The Big 3 of Indian cricket, The Big Three of Indian cricket, Virender Sehwag, Wasim Jaffer |
Permalink
Posted by vmminerva
September 17, 2008
I cannot help but ask. Why? Why Ganguly? Is it because something had to be done? Someone had to go? Some stop gap arrangement needed to be made to smother the screaming for including young talent? Or is it Peter Roebuck? Weāve reacted to Chappellās remark on Sehwag before the tour of Australia late last year. So is that the new mantra to selection ā listening to the Aussies? But now Ponting is questioning Gangulyās omission. What do we do now?
The bigger question is this. Is Sourav not even good enough for the Irani Trophy. Well, the condescending talk from some of the āunnamedā selectors does make it seem that way. But then, I have another question. Why Jaffer? What has Jaffer done between his disastrous run in Australia earlier this year and now, to justify an inclusion to the dress rehearsal for the upcoming Aussie series. Or was he an automatic selection given that we are playing Australia at home or because Jaffer plays for Mumbai?
Turning our attention back to Dada, if you asked me, I could argue both sides: for and against the exclusion of Sourav Ganguly from the Irani Trophy squad. The argument against is jaded, so Iāll pass on that. Why does a Ganguly fan think this exclusion is good for him? Because it will wake up the lion in him ā thought Iām not sure how many times he needs to prove his worth. Honestly, if he gets selected for the series against Australia, which he should, it will only have helped to have the lion (or should I say tiger) in Ganguly to be awake and growling. But one wonders, how long will he fight this sort of battle?
On the Kirsten/Kumbleās hand in this, I think the media has again sensationalized the story. I suspect it had more to do with Kirsten than Kumble. But maybe thatās just me, for Iāve never hid my dislike for Kirsten.
So why was it Ganguly? There are times like this when being a team man counts for more than anything else; when just that fact that youāve tried as hard as you could have counts to your advantage. There is something about Ganguly that makes you think he took a situation casually. Maybe itās his persona. Perhaps it is way he projects the facts. Maybe it is deju-vu from the old āI-donātāwant-to-play-the-new-ballā tactic. This is when you feel a little sad, that someone so gifted has thrown it away, almost arrogantly, like the straight sixes Sourav hits. This is why, I think, Dravid escaped the axe. If Dravid wasnāt the team man that we know him to be, even Kumble could not have saved him. But all isnāt well for Dravid either, for he scored two, yes, 2, in the Buchi Babu tournament in the match against Tripura. For once, I donāt think thatās very good news and feel a bit more apprehensive about this than I have before. If Dravid makes it past Irani, past Ausralia, he will have a good run for a year or so. If not, well yikes! God save Dravid and India.
Most of all this selection for the Irani Trophy seemed to me like the populist union budged this year. It tries to make everyone happy: the senior fans sans the Ganguly fans and the young aspirants. But the inconsistencies are glaring and it has been so through the years. Dravid was dropped from the ODI squad 3 matches after a brilliant match-winning 92 in Bristol. Yuvraj was persisted with after several failures for over a year, not more than 2 innings over 50. But that is Indian cricket for you!
13 Comments |
Anil Kumble, BCCI, Cricket, Dravid, Ganguly, Ian Chappel, India, India-Aus series, India-England ODI series, Indian cricket, Karnataka, Kumble, Rahul Dravid, Sehwag, Sourav Ganguly, The Big 3 of Indian cricket, Vengsarkar, Yuvraj, Yuvraj Singh | Tagged: Anil Kumble, Austalia, Australiaās tour of India 2008, BCCI, Bristol, Buchi Babu tournament, Cricket, Dravid, Ganguly, Ganguly dropped, Gary Kirsten, Ian Chappell, Ian Chappell on Sehwag, India, Indiaās tour of Australia 07-08, Indian cricket, Irani Trophy, Jaffer, Karnataka, Kirsten, Kumble, ODI cricket, Peter Roebuck, Ponting, Rahul Dravid, Rest of India, Ricky Ponting, Roebuck, Sehwag, selectors, Sourav Ganguly, Test Cricket, Virender Sehwag, Wasim Jaffer, Yuvraj, Yuvraj Singh |
Permalink
Posted by vmminerva
September 16, 2008
So what can a few crazy weeks do? It’s made me feel like it’s been a decade since I blogged, read the news, or pretty much had a life. Much has happened since I last blogged: Ganguly got dropped from Rest of India; Jaffer got recalled and Lehman Brothers went bankrupt. I still haven’t found a copy of Marcus Trescothick’s autobiography. Instead I found a biog of Sehwag written by one of my favorite cricket writers – Vijay Lokapally – but haven’t had a chance to read beyond the foreword.
Finally my apologies to my regular visitors for not replying to your comments. I hope to return to normalcy soon.
Cheers!
6 Comments |
India | Tagged: Ganguly, Irani Trophy, Jaffer, Lehman brothers, Marcus Trescothick, Rest of India team, Sehwag, Sourav Ganguly, Vijay Lokapally, Virender Sehwag, Wasim Jaffer |
Permalink
Posted by vmminerva
May 25, 2008
For an IPL match that was largely called a battle to avoid the wooden spoon, it entertained quite well.
The entertainment value was not top class, but it felt like standard cricket: not too euphoric, for the most part, and even boring sometimes, but not without fluttering a supporter’s heart.
The Bangalore Royal Challengers seemed to have carried on some momentum from their previous unbelievable win against Chennai. Without Zaheer and Praveen, one would have thought the bowling had chinks, but the local boys and under-19s contributed well to the line up. The team spirit seems to have gotten better over the past couple of games.
Gilchrist won the toss and chose to bat first. Dravid responded by opening the bowling with Kumble, a move that seemd to suggest that he has returned to thinking ways, as opposed to panicking. Risky? Yes. Payed off? Not completely, but the Kumble-Steyn combination stopped the Gilchrist-Gibbs pair get off to a flyer. The move almost payed off with Kumble appealing although unsuccessfully for lbw against Gibbs. It remained just a close one, which umpire Koertzen turned down. Steyn continued some his good work from the the last couple matches. While the Deccan run rate was kept down to 5-odd for the first couple of overs, the bowling change to Kallis brought some change in fortunes. Shortly after taking a pummelling, Kallis retired hurt causing worries for the bating. The local boy Vinay Kumar with U-19 Virat Kohli succeded in keeping the Deccans down as Bangalore regularly picked up wickets. Perhaps the biggest blow for the Deccan was losing the IPL star Rohit Sharma after he hurt himself while batting.
Going by Bangalore’s chasing record, going after 165 seemed tough, but there was some hope with Jaffer on top to lead some stability. However, Jaffer turned out to be the clown of the batting line up for first running himself out and then atrociously running out the injured but belligerent Kallis by some very lazy running. Misbah came settled down, thrilled and went. Dravid also came, threatened to lead the chase, thrilled indeed with a six and three consecutive fours- all priceless beauties (including a Misbah trademark cheeky reverse one), but departed by mis-timing one from Sanjay Bangar. It seemed to be over for Bangalore at that point with the asking rate creeping to over 10. However they weren’t destined for the wooden spoon. Thanks to some hitting from until-now indifferent White and Kohli, but mostly to Akhil for sealing it with 2 sixes towards the end of 18th over. At the end of the day, it was team work that did it for Bangalore: everyone chipped in when it was required.
Mallya! You spilled trash too soon. This team isn’t as bad as your mouth.
Go Bangalore! Go Dravid!
3 Comments |
Anil Kumble, Bangalore, Cricket, Dravid, Gilchrist, India, IPL, Rahul Dravid, T-20 Cricket, Zaheer Khan | Tagged: Akhil, Anil Kumble, B Akhil, Bangalore, Bangalore Royal Challengers, Bangalore Royal Challengers vs. Deccan Chargers, Bangalore vs. Hyderabad, Bangar, Cameron White, Deccan Chargers, Dravid, Gibbs, Gilchrist, Hyderabad, IPL, Jaffer, Kallis, Kumble, Mallya, Misbah, Misbah ul Haq, Praveen Kumar, Rahul Dravid, Rohit Sharma, Rudi Koertzen, Steyn, T20, T20 cricket, Vinay Kumar, Virat Kohli, Wasim Jaffer, Zaheer Khan |
Permalink
Posted by vmminerva
April 19, 2008
Poor dear, Dravid! You’re luck of late has been worse than mine! š¦
Like many 20-20 crazy folk would have expected, the Test-squad-ish Bangalore, got royally hit on the head, mattai adi as the Chennai folk would call it.
However, all is not lost, if you are Bangalore fan, that is. It was one match, and there was clearly only one star – Brenden McCullum. As Dravid said at the presentation, if you take away McCullum’s score, you get 70-odd. Though I don’t fully agree with that statement – had McCullum not scored as much, maybe someone else would have played responsibly – there is some truth to it. Given that bouncy wicket, the scorecard will have looked different. But having said that, I must say that it was heartening to see Sourav’s captaincy still rocking!
Problems areas for Bangalore include Jaffer: the out-of-form, short-of-runs-in-the-recent-season, mostly Test-only batsman, Sunil Joshi, Zaheer to some extent, and the lack of a quality spinner (in Kumble’s absense). Adding to the woes are trying-to-return-to-form Dravid and currently-lacklustre Kallis. (Gosh! I’m having a serious adjective-block)
If you are down in the dumps after last night’s thrashing, fellow blogger Scorpicity has some food for the wounded soul. If Bangalore continues to get sloshed, I might join Scorpy in throwing expletives and rotten tomatoes at the IPL.
6 Comments |
Bangalore, Dravid, India, Indian cricket, Kumble, Rahul Dravid, T-20 Cricket, Zaheer Khan | Tagged: Anil Kumble, Bangalore, Bangalore Royal Challengers, Bangalore vs. Kolkata, Brenden McCullum, Cricket, Dravid, India, IPL, Jaffer, Joshi, Kallis, Kolkata, Kolkata Knight Riders, Kumble, McCullum, Rahul Dravid, T20 cricket |
Permalink
Posted by vmminerva