November 24, 2010
Could have been a more convincing series victory, had the pitches been more conducive. Credit to NZ for a good batting display in the first two matches of the series. Pity that they got a few bad decisions in the Nagpur Test from umpire Nigel Long. Despite, that I still believe the URDS referral system in its present form won’t help. What will help is the way umpires like Taufel refer when they aren’t sure. There’s an element of self-respect/ego from the umpires that takes a beating while doing that, but when they do let that go a little bit, it buys them back a lot respect.
Positives for India from this series:
1. Gambhir showing signs of returning to form from a temporary slump. The ODI series and added responsibility as captain might help that further.
2. Man of the Match Dravid finds his lost touch and gets runs! There cannot be better news before the SA tour starts. Yes, the conditions will be different there, but one know what to expect from a veteran.
3. Pace battery charged up – Ishant seems in great form. If Zaheer returns, both of them on SA pitches can be a handful. Sreeshant has had a good comeback too.
Can’t wait for South Africa!
2 Comments | Cricket, Dravid, India, Indian cricket, Sreesaanth, Sreesanth, Test Cricket, Umpiring, Zaheer Khan | Tagged: Cricket, Dravid, Gambhir, Gautam Gambhir, India, India win NZ series, India win NZ series 1-0, India's tour of South Africa, Indian cricket, Ishant Sharma, Man of the Match Dravid, New Zealand, New Zealand's tour of India 2010, Rahul Dravid, Sreesanth, Sreeshant, Test Cricket, Zaheer Khan | Permalink
Posted by vmminerva
October 5, 2010
Limitations sometimes propel people to greatness. Sometimes, when something is missing, you focus more on how to compensate for that missing something. This time, there were two batsmen with limitations – VVS with his back spasm and Ishant with a knee issue – that fought with sterling grit to snatch victory from near definite defeat!
VVS Laxman proved yet again that he’s not only special, he’s Spectacular. Having played perhaps the most innings (for a solid Indian bastman) with the tail, he knew how it had to be done. It’s just that the luck and grit was needed from the other side. The kind of calmness and poise he brought with the bat was invaluable, not to mention juggling a runner and a tail ender. Even today, year after the Laxman-ODI debate, many fans of Indian cricket will rue why he never made it to the Indian ODI team.
I started watching today’s proceedings on after Ishant came to the crease. I was expecting a bit more from Harbhajan, for all his improved batting and the like. I must say, equal credit in the win must go to Ishant. What he couldn’t do in Sydney in 2008 to draw a match, he did to win this one. And what a time to choose to display such grit! Kudos to the young fellow. With temperment like this, he’s bound to go a long way! And that must only auger well for India.
The Aussies deserve special mention for their efforts, for without that, today’s match would not have been the nail biting advertisement for Test cricket that it was. They peppered the top order with bouncers, chin music, rib rackers and the like, causing them in turn to crumble, although not without some semblance of a fight. Hilfenhaus was perhaps at his best (from my memory of him in recent games). But they perhaps missed Bollinger in the later half of today. Despite that, the fielding from an Aussie side was a bit below par. They don’t generally drop this many catches, and miss this many run outs. Ponting’s lack of the gambler’s instinct didn’t help either. I don’t understand why he didn’t try Clarke’s off spin.
Mediocre umpiring on also played its hand in the game. But fortunately, the errors went in favor of both sides equally. If Hussey missed out, so did Gambhir. If Ishant was given out lbw off a clear edge, Ohja was given a reprieve. What iis strange is that even the third umpire got at least one controversial decision wrong. This is what keeps me still against the controversial Umpire Refferal system. What needs to be done, is the quality of umpiring improved. If the on-field umpire isnt sure what to do, he must ego-lessly refer to the third umpire, and not merely give in to vociferous shouts from in-fielders.
Having said all that, it was still a thrilling day of Test cricket. It’s unfortunate that one team had to lose. While I’m not complaining too much about that, I think in the end, the battle was more in the mind, as it turns out with many such thrilling games.
Long live Test Cricket.
Looking forward to Bangalore!
7 Comments | Bangalore, Cricket, India, India-Aus series, Indian cricket, Laxman, Ricky Ponting, Sydney Test, Test Cricket, Umpiring | Tagged: Australia, Australia's tour of India 2010, Ben Hilfenhaus, Bollinger, controversial Sydney Test 2008, Cricket, Gambhir, Gautam Gambhir, Hilfenhaus, Hussey, India, India win Mohali Test, Indian cricket, Ishant, Ishant Sharma, Laxman, Micheal Clarke, Miracle at Mohali, Miracles, Mohali Test, Ohja, Sydney Test, Test Cricket, Umpiring, umpiring referral, umpiring review system, VVS, VVS Laxman | Permalink
Posted by vmminerva
April 8, 2010
Sourav Ganguly never fails to inspire, at least for me. Delhi started the 180-plus chase fairly well, even after the early departure of David Warner. Viru and Sehwag chased in a way that is charesteristic only to them. But Gambhir’s wicket was key. After that, though there was Sehwag at one end, the others seemed jittery.
Some excellent fielding from Dada and and inspired bowling changes help turn KKR’s fortunes. After Sehwag, it was all downhill. Good to see KKR win.
Woo hoo! Rock it, Dada.
3 Comments | Cricket, Ganguly, India, Indian cricket, IPL, Sehwag, Sourav Ganguly, T-20 Cricket | Tagged: Cricket, Dada, David Warner, DD, Delhi, Delhi Daredevils, Eden Gardens, Gambhir, Ganguly, Gautam Gambhir, India, Indian cricket, Indian Premier League, IPL, IPL3, KKR, Kolkata, Kolkata Knight Riders, Sehwag, Sourav Ganguly, T20, Virender Sehwag, Viru | Permalink
Posted by vmminerva
March 14, 2010
One was expecting an Say-wah-g-ian innings from the dasher. What we got to see was a gem from Gauti. That was one cool-headed knock from the Delhi captain. Good to see there’s a good successor to Dhoni. (Allright, one match isn’t enough to judge, but seriously, this has to be a good sign).
In case you missed the match, fear not. For our friend SB has it all here.
Way to go, Gauti.
Leave a Comment » | Cricket, Dhoni, India, Indian cricket, IPL, T-20 Cricket | Tagged: Cricket, DD, Delhi, Delhi Daredevils, Delhi Daredevils vs. King's XI Punjab, Dhoni, Gautam Gambhir, Gautham Gambhir, India, Indian cricket, Indian Premier League, IPL, IPL 3, Kings XI Punjab, Punjab, Sehwag, Virender Sehwag, Viru | Permalink
Posted by vmminerva
April 1, 2009
What a couple of days of Test cricket. Nowadays, it’s more satisfying to see a team save a match while chasing a mammoth total than it is to see a match with a result.
This was the occasion to show grit, and it was very satisfying to the hyped Indian batting line-up live up to their statistics. While Sehwag threw away an opportunity to show his captaincy prowess and give Dhoni some competition, Gambhir has taken a huge stride forward in his Test career. It will be sometime before we can truly bank on such innings from him for it takes more than just a few gritty innings to be called the Wall, even if it is Wall version 2. That said, credit needs to be given where it is due. He’s definitely a class apart from the other youngsters, Yuvraj included. Way to go Gambhir! I will not call you just a dumb slogger riding on form anymore.
Speaking of thrown away opportunities, add Dinesh Karthik to the list: his wicket keeping, from what I saw, left a lot to be desired. Looks like all of Dhoni’s competitors (for captaincy and keeping) have either given up or have no hope or intention. On to Yuvraj “I’m either a Prince or a rabbit” Singh. I think it is about time we replace him at Test level with some other promising talent. Where is Vijay who debuted against Australia? Now that would be a talent to nurture for the future.
Our good old Dravid once again did the job that only he does best, except this time, it was cut short by an umpiring error. Fellow blogger Soulberry has also ranted about this evil that cricketing has been plagued with of late. The newly elite Ian Gould has robbed us of what could have been another golden Dravid innings. Like Soulberry says, with such a sweetly timed six that one would wonder why there weren’t many more of those in his Test career. For the nth time, Dravid’s defence was serene and sublime. Brush me aside for being a fan-girl, but this innings of Dravs was definitely special. And some of us wanted him to retire. To me he looks good for another three years. I cannot stop marveling at the patience and grit. Go Draivd, you rock! Moving on, VVS and Sachin were vintage adding to the job that needed completion; nothing less.
So we think we battled it out. But not everyone agrees. This article by Kiwi journalist Paul Lewis had me thinking, and bit offended. True, we did in the past produced dust bowls in India, thanks to our internal pan-BCCI squabbles, we’ve often offered a green top to a side with exceptional fast bowlers. If there is a doubt on the ability of this Indian line up, which I think is probably the best one to deal with the green top on windy conditions (only I would replace Yuvraj with either a promising youngster like Vijay, or with good old fiesty Sourav) in over two decades. So, give us the green top and challenge us. Then we shall see who has conquered.
5 Comments | BCCI, Cricket, Dhoni, Dinesh Karthik, Dravid, Ganguly, India, Laxman, Rahul Dravid, Sehwag, Sourav Ganguly, Tendulkar, Umpiring, Yuvraj, Yuvraj Singh | Tagged: Dravid, Gambhir, Gautam Gambhir, India, India's tour of New Zealand 2009, Indian cricket, Laxman, M Vijay, Monk, Murali Vijay, Napier Test, New Zealand, Rahul Dravid, Sachin, Sachin Tendulkar, Sehwag, Tendulkar, Test Cricket, The Monk, The Wall, Virender Sehwag, Viru, VVS, VVS Laxman | Permalink
Posted by vmminerva