November 1, 2008
Alright, am I the only one bored by the Delhi Test? The other stuff seems to be interesting.
The Gambhir ban has been an interesting issue. Fellow blogger ABisht sees it as a half-full-half-empty thing. As always, the subcontinent guy gets hauled up. Perhaps this is the only way the toothless ICC servants can get back at the “new-power-rich” BCCI. While the part of me that wants to be fair, might want to say, maybe this is a good lesson for the folk who indulge in unnecessary drama on the cricket field, the partisan in me is angry that it is the Indian that gets the harsh treatment. Why was Watson, the provoker, let off with a fine, that too, off a token-like 10%? This issue can be beaten to death, but it’s a dead horse. The more striking issue is the arrogance of the Indian youth. As I look at my own generation, there is a sense of disrespect for and cynicism towards almost everything. Granted this might be a generational thing, but the brashness now is too obvious to ignore. This crudeness has crept into cricket as well. Uthappa’s dig on the seniors’ fielding comes to mind. No, it’s not about the whole “respect the senior cricketers” dying horse either. It’s the needless attitude and ego that’s bothersome. Back to Gambhir. Why the “elbowing”, Gambhir? Why the street-side-boy attitude? Perhaps it is this garishness that has reduced the sympathy that Gambhir is getting on this. Perhaps he is also suffering the aftermath of the Bhajji “banned-but-not-but-then-banned-in-IPL”. To be honest, I’m ambivalent on this, but in titling in favor of the fact that the ban might be a bit too hard, but only in small measure.
Adam Gilchrist, who certainly had a lot of Indian fans, may be left with a lot lesser fans now. I didn’t feel the need to write about his comments on Tendulkar, for it seemed like the cheap old publicity trick. But now, he’s roping in Ganguly and Harbhajan. I’m not cutting any slack for Ganguly on the Nagpur 2004 Test Houdini act – a chapter in Indian cricket that will remain shrouded with several questions until someone comes out with the truth – but doesn’t Gilchrist have anything better to talk about. Apparently he wants to befriend his former teammates who don’t return phones calls and emails to the “bloke who used to walk when he was out”. Gilchrist has utterly lost my respect, for whatever that is worth. And he will NOT get my money for his book, which I have decided not to buy, despite whatever else he may have said in it. Now, we know the True Colors, don’t we?
12 Comments | BCCI, Bhajji, Cricket, Ganguly, Gilchrist, India, India-Aus series, Indian cricket, IPL, Robin Uthappa, Sourav Ganguly, Tendulkar | Tagged: Adam Gilchrist, Australia, BCCI, Bhajji, disrespect for seniors, Gambhir, Gambhir banned, Ganguly, Gautam Gambhir, Gilchirst on Nagpur 2004 Test, Gilchrist, Gilchrist on Ganguly, Gilchrist on Harbhajan, Gilchrist on Tendulkar, Gilchrist True Colors, Harbhajan Sydney ban, India, Indian cricket, IPL, Sachin Tendulkar, Shane Watson, Sourav Ganguly, Tendulkar, Uthappa, Watson, Watson provoked Gambhir | Permalink
Posted by vmminerva
October 22, 2008
India triumph over Australia to go 1-0 up in the Border Gavaskar Trophy 2008-09 with a historic win in the second Test at Mohali. Team effort and proactive captaincy made this possible. Australia have been bringing the best out of India for the past 5 years now, with each victory arguably better than the other in quality.
Congratulations, India! A well earned victory! Cheers!
But the series isn’t over yet and there is still some good work to do.
Where now from here for India? India need to keep the intensity just where it is, if not turn it up another notch. The bowling attack with Ishant, Bhajji and Zaheer is rocking. Mishra had a compelling debut. Delhi will be key and the selectors will have one hell of a task picking a playing XI. I shall save that for another discussion, but I must add that for once, I’m glad that this selection isn’t my job!
India’s batting is still a bit of a concern. Ganguly has been the best performer so far – he’s looked solid in defence, characteristic in attack and has played his natural game. Viru and Gambhir closely follow. There are still a few question marks around the others in the batting order with respect to solidity, based on current form.
As for the Aussie, I would give anything to hear from Greg Chappell. 🙂 I’ll save my comments on him till the end of the series. Ponting has some sorting out to do. Clarke is good only in patches. I don’t understand how Shane Watson and Cameron White made it to the side. The only reason I can think of is thier familiarity to the conditions from IPL. Watson, course played for the Rajasthan Royals and White, rather unimpressively for Bangalore Royal Challengers. I find it hard to believe that the Aussies don’t have anything better in the closet. Haddin has a long way to go – an average keeper and below-average Test batsman. Siddle was hyped beyond proportions, might be (along with Johnson) the better ones from the newer lot. Lee is obviously out of form/rusty. Two players hold the key – Hayden and Hussey. While lashing out at the apparent lack-of-quality/experience in the Aussie line up, in the back of my mind, there is this dark thought that India might face this very situation (maybe even worse with the batting) when the Fab four disappear from the scene. But that is not for this day.
This day, we celebrate for going one step ahead to re-gaining the Border Gavaskar Trophy! Cheers!
13 Comments | Bhajji, Cricket, Dhoni, Dravid, Ganguly, India, India-Aus series, Indian cricket, Laxman, Rahul Dravid, Ricky Ponting, Sehwag, Sourav Ganguly, Tendulkar, The Big 3 of Indian cricket, Zaheer Khan | Tagged: Amit Mishra, Amit Mishra's debut, Aussie team, Australia, Bangalore Royal Challengers, Bhajji, Border Gavaskar Trophy, Brad Haddin, Bree Lee, Clarke, Cricket, Dhoni, Dhoni captaincy, Dravid, Fab Four, Fab four of Indian cricket, Gambhir, Ganguly, Gautham Gambhir, Greg Chappell, Haddin, Harbhajan, Harbhajan Singh, Hayden, Hussey, Ind vs Aus 2008-09 Day 5, India, India vs. Aus 2nd Test Mohali, India win 2nd Test at Mohali, IPL, Ishant, Ishant Sharma, Johnson, Lee, Michael Clarke, Mishra, Mitchell Johnson, Mohali, MS Dhoni, Peter Siddle, Ponting, Rajasthan Royals, Ricky Ponting, Sehwag, selectors, Shane Watson, Siddle, Sourav Ganguly, Tendulkar, Test Cricket, The Big 3 of Indian cricket, The Big Three of Indian cricket, Virender Sehwag, VVS Laxman, Watson, Zaheer Khan | Permalink
Posted by vmminerva
October 12, 2008
That was some drama for a side that was 69-0 at the end of Day 2 after about half-a-session’s play. If you’re an India supporter, you can never rule out the fall of Sehwag to rash shot early in the first session. It would be unfair to criticize him for that, for it is that very rashness that shocks the opposition and some times his own team. But Gambhir was first to go and that was plumb!
Enter Dravid. I thought he looked a lot better today than he has in the last 3 months. Maybe it helped that he’d played on a similar low-bounce/uneven-bounce pitch at the Irani Trophy just a few weeks ago. Yes, it was disappointing that, given the start he had and how “set” he looked, he was unable to carry on. As a fan, I would call it a contentious lbw decision, perhaps the most contentious since that 47 again Pakistan late last year, but on a more rational note, getting one’s front pad out so far is bound to create doubts in the mind of umpires. What is heartening is that Dravid has been getting better, albeit slowly, since the hole that deepened in Sri Lanka. What we saw today was a thoughtful innings, mindful of the Ponting’s traps, and hard-working and patient enough not to fall for it. The difference between this innings of Dravid and the previous few was the more obvious attempt to make runs, and faster (given the conditions, his strike rate and Wall-ish tendencies). Most of his runs came from between the deep fine leg and deep square leg area. Well played, Dravid. Cricinfo describes Dravid’s innings from today here.
Sachin and Laxman, the latter despite being pushed up the order, failed. Maybe it is Sachin, not Ganguly, who should be retiring. A rather harsh thought about Laxman has been bothering me for some time now – maybe part of the success he’s since is because he’s been playing with the tail. Fielding sides tend to ignore the batsman and target the tail ender. I do realize that this is very rash, cynical and even evil on my part, but maybe 10% of it is true?
Sourav “Dada” Ganguly Maharaj, as blogging-friend Soulberry calls him, played a fighting innings. If it wasn’t for a lapse in concentration, he could have carried on. I’m not even going to say anything about Dhoni’s innings.
The hero of the day should undoubtedly be Harbhajan Singh. Yes, he’s been batting rather well for some time now, but today’s innings was one which even top-order batsmen would envy. Those shots weren’t slogs – they were proper cricketing shots. An innings for class – a good mix of defensive shots, wristy drives and aggressive “over-the-bowler’s-head” one. Was a pity he went less an over before Stumps today. Zaheer did well to support Harbhajan. The “never-give-up” spirit shown by Harbhajan and Zaheer is what India-Aus from the past decade has been about about. The top-order batsmen will do well to take from what they saw from two tail-enders.
I see this match going two ways: a draw or an Aussie victory. There’s an outside chance that India have to win this, but that’s asking for way too many miracles from too many people. For India to win, tail-enders Kumble and Zaheer need to put on at least another 60-80 runs. The closer they get to 400 the better. Then, they need to bowl and field really well and get the Aussie out to chase less than 180-odd runs. Then, we need to hope that Indian batting doesn’t collapse – either due to out-of-formness, lack of confidence, fear of failure or umpiring errors. Whew! Isn’t that a huge ask. On current form, I’m not expecting much from the Indian second innings, either. India will feel moral victory if they draw this.
7 Comments | Anil Kumble, Bangalore, Cricket, Dhoni, Dravid, Ganguly, Harbhajan Singh, India, India-Aus series, Indian cricket, Kumble, Laxman, Pakistan, Rahul Dravid, Sehwag, Sourav Ganguly, Tendulkar, Tendulkar retirment rumors, The Big 3 of Indian cricket, Umpiring, Zaheer Khan | Tagged: Anil Kumble, Australia, Australia's tour of India 2008, Bangalore, Bhajji, Cricket, Dhoni, Dravid, Dravid given out wrongly, Gambhir, Ganguly, Gautham Gambhir, Harbhajan, Harbhajan Singh, India, India vs. Australia First Test, India vs. Australia First Test Bangalore, India's tour of Sri Lanka 2008, Irani Trophy, Kumble, Laxman, MS Dhoni, Rahul Dravid, Sachin Tendulkar, Sehwag, Sourav Ganguly, Tendulkar, Test Cricket, The Big 3 of Indian cricket, The Big Three of Indian cricket, Virender Sehwag, VVS Laxman, Zaheer, Zaheer Khan | Permalink
Posted by vmminerva
October 3, 2008
Yes, Dada is in; something for Ganguly fan to cheer. Many expected this. Fellow blogger Ottayan, sarcastically or seriously suggested that this might very well be the case.
While I rejoice in Ganguly’s Nth coming, Souberry will surely be thrilled by the inclusion of Amit Mishra. I guess the change in selecion panel did it for him.
My only gripe – yes, we always have something to barb about BCCI’s selections – is Badrinath’s selection. My vote would have been for Aakash Chopra, but I don’t think he’s got the right age. At the moment 19 is a good age. Furthermore, with Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli’s score against Australia in the ongoing tour match, Chopra will be forgotten, unless, logic prevails.
Rest of the squad remains intact, at least for the moment:
Anil Kumble (capt), Virender Sehwag, Gautam Gambhir, Rahul Dravid, Sachin Tendulkar, Sourav Ganguly, VVS Laxman, Mahendra Singh Dhoni (wk), Harbhajan Singh, Zaheer Khan, Ishant Sharma, Munaf Patel, RP Singh, S Badrinath, Amit Mishra
Go Dada! Rock em!
9 Comments | Anil Kumble, BCCI, Cricket, Dhoni, Dravid, Ganguly, Harbhajan Singh, India, India-Aus series, Indian cricket, Kumble, Laxman, Rahul Dravid, Sehwag, Sourav Ganguly, Tendulkar, The Big 3 of Indian cricket | Tagged: Aakash Chopra, Amit Mishra, Anil Kumble, Australia, Australia's tour of India 2008, BCCI, Bhajji, Cricket, Dada, Dravid, Gambhir, Ganguly, Ganguly in, Gautam Gambhir, Harbhajan Singh, India, India-Aus series, Ishant, Ishant Sharma, Kumble, Laxman, Mahendra Singh Dhoni (wk), MS Dhoni, Munaf Patel, Rahul Dravid, RP Singh, S Badrinath, Sachin Tendulkar, Sehwag, Sourav Ganguly, team selection, Tendulkar, Virender Sehwag, VVS, VVS Laxman, Zaheer Khan | Permalink
Posted by vmminerva
September 24, 2008
Never trust the media! For the umpteenth time I have rediscovered this truth. Ok, it was not the best of innings from the Rest of India batsman, but when a team scores over 220-230, it is NOT a collapse. Why was Jaffer’s innings “fine” and Dravid’s innings circumspect ? They scored 50 and 46 each in 91 and 95 balls respectively. Jaffer’s list of boundaries reads 5 while Dravid’s count is 4. So much for that.
What I gathered from the first hour and a half of the game, which I caught before heading to work, was this: it was a warm up match and this could very well have been the score that India would have got in the first Test against in Aussies had they played without a warm up, with many batsmen taking a break of over a month. The truth is Jaffer was his “domestic-player” self and looked a bit better than “finding-my-form” Dravid, in comparison. Dravid was initially very shaky, so much to have this fan very worried and sad, but he picked it up later and played some very positive shots. Yes, there are still concerns; yes, he did struggle against Ishant Sharma, as I had I predicted yesterday; yes, the back foot isn’t moving to guard the off stump – a sure sign of out-of-form-ness, but there were some cracking shots which suggest a better comeback is near. Apart from the openers Jaffer and Dravid, no one else made an impression. Laxman was elegant in pieces but threw it away too quickly. The hypes of the day – Kaif and Badri remained hypes. They did not impress with strokeplay or with thier reading of the bowling and ended up with strike rates in the 30s, lesser that both Jaffer and Dravid. Harbhajan played an impressive innings, seriously! 🙂 Ishant bowled as per hype and is at the moment worthy of all the hype. It would be interesting to see Chopra and Gambhir feast off an Ishant-less Rest of India.
As for Delhi, I thought Sehwag’s captaincy was initially defensive. I won’t comment on my gatherings from the highlights as it will tantamount to picking a team looking at scorecards alone 😀 . Delhi have a fire-power laden batting line up, but if the top 3 fail, it looks a bit brittle. The pitch might slow down after lunch tomorrow to make Day 2 the best day for batting. I’m starting to like Aakash Chopra very much and should find a place in the Indian XI, if Tendulkar doesn’t make it. Speaking of India, we still need Ganguly, the Kaif and Badri’s won’t do at the moment. After all, when you’ve got better, it would be foolish to not use it.
Tomorrow we shall find out if Harbhajan and Kumble feast off the pitch or fizzle away.
3 Comments | Anil Kumble, Bhajji, Cricket, Dravid, Ganguly, India, India-Aus series, Indian cricket, Kumble, Laxman, Rahul Dravid, Sehwag, Sourav Ganguly, Tendulkar, The Big 3 of Indian cricket | Tagged: Aakash Chopra, Anil Kumble, Australia's tour of India 2008, Badrinath, Bhajji, Delhi, Dravid, Gambhir, Ganguly, Gautham Gambhir, Harbhajan, Harbhajan Singh, India, India-Aus series, Indian cricket, Indian Media, Irani Trohpy, Jaffer, Kaif, Kumble, Rahul Dravid, Rest of India, Sachin Tendulkar, Sehwag, Sehwag captaincy, Sourav Ganguly, Tendulkar, Test Cricket, The Big 3 of Indian cricket, The Big Three of Indian cricket, Virender Sehwag, Wasim Jaffer | Permalink
Posted by vmminerva